The jobs worth your attention, already read.
You answer questions once. Then every day, the jobs worth your attention arrive already read — with the reason, the gaps, and the documents to apply.
Not "find more jobs faster." The market does not have more jobs; at senior level it has very few, scattered across places you would not think to look, described in language that hides whether they fit.
- Runs in Claude
- Gmail connector
- ~30 min interview
- Résumé optional
- No API keys
Claude only today. It doesn't run in ChatGPT or Gemini, and we'd rather say so here than have you find out after paying. Authorising the Gmail connector is the setup — no app passwords, no mail filters, nothing else to configure.
This page marks its own claims the way the kit marks yours. What we've measured carries EVIDENCE. What we haven't carries ASSUMPTION. This is the kit with real receipts — and the thing we still don't know is in the ledger too.
Join the founding list
Early access, founding pricing, and a voice in what ships first. No spam; a handful of emails, ever.
Four complaints, one shape
- "I only ever see a capped list, so I'm missing possibly more."
- "I had to set all of those emails up — which is not entirely trivial."
- "If I was looking for a job in artificial intelligence technology, I'm not sure even where to look."
- "Copying and pasting becomes quite burdensome."
The work of running a search is administrative, and the administration crowds out the judgment.
Built for someone senior enough that qualifying roles are rare — where the scarce thing is not your time but the supply of roles worth applying to. Not built for high-volume applying; there are cheaper tools for that, and they are the wrong shape for this.
Seven things, in order
An interview that produces your résumé as a by-product
It starts where you can answer: your last job, then the one before. What the role was, what you accomplished, what you liked, why you left — working backwards until the answers stop mattering. If you don't have a résumé, you have one when it ends. If you do, the interview aims at what the résumé left out.
A criteria file that is yours, in your words
A plain, readable, editable list of rules — what you will and will not take, with your own sentences quoted as the reason. Not a profile on someone's server. A file you own, that you can read on a bad day and disagree with.
A daily read, not a daily list
Nothing is thrown away on a location or a salary line — postings get both wrong constantly. The only thing filtered is seniority, because a title reliably says whether a job is senior and reliably says nothing else. Everything else is read in full, including the qualifications section every automated tool skips.
The eliminated list, with reasons
Every rejection shows the rule that made it. You can overrule it, and your correction becomes a rule that changes every later decision. It learns in both directions: what it killed that you would keep, and what it surfaced that you would not.
Sources you didn't know existed
The trade press, professional bodies, executive search firms and niche boards for your field. A healthcare IT executive gets Becker's, CHIME, ACHE; an AI engineer gets an entirely different list from the same process. Then the employers worth watching get their own boards checked directly — complete and uncapped.
Application packages, not advice
For each role you pursue: a tailored résumé and cover letter as Word documents, plus instructions for the specific applicant-tracking system in the path — because a Workday application is read first by a parser and a Greenhouse application is read first by a person, and the résumé should differ accordingly.
Employers you never want to see
Your current employer. Former employers. Anywhere a non-compete reaches. Named once, with the reason, and never surfaced again — reversible without re-arguing why. In testing, the reference buyer's former employer produced three roles squarely in his lane and inside his commute zone. Seeing them was worse than useless.
And one page that shows where everything stands — every role, its state, what happens next, and where your documents are.
What it will not do — stated up front
Nothing is sent without you pressing send.
No login, no scraping, no automation. That is a design choice: tools that automate LinkedIn get accounts restricted, and your account is the asset you cannot replace.
No source is complete. It unions the ones that can be reached without breaking anyone's terms — and tells you what it is not reaching.
Small companies that hire through networks, and interim or fractional work that moves through placement firms, are largely invisible to it. Named, not hidden.
No keyword stuffing, no invented experience. If a required qualification is missing, the documents argue the case honestly instead of papering over it.
Why it isn't the tools you already know
| Trackers (Teal, Huntr, Simplify) | Auto-apply bots | This kit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it does | Organises what you found | Fires applications at volume | Decides what is worth your attention, and why |
| Where it runs | Their servers | Their servers | Your machine, your Claude |
| Your search data | Their database | Their database | Never leaves your environment |
| Cost | $24–50 per month | $99–249 | One time |
| Learns you | No | No | Every correction becomes a rule |
| Platform risk | — | Account restriction | None — nothing is automated against a platform |
On the price: the honest comparison for a senior search isn't a $29-a-month tracker, it's the tier people actually buy when the stakes are a year of their working life — a career coach, an outplacement package, a résumé service. This sits at $199, once. The tracker math is a price anchor, not a feature claim.
What's proven, and what isn't
A full sweep of 2,160 postings across 49 employers, unattended, with zero errors. Reference instance, 2026-08-03.
~1,100 postings reduced to 2 genuine candidates — one of which none of the buyer's existing sources had surfaced. Reference instance, 2026-08-03.
That a stranger will pay $199 for this. The machinery is measured; the market is not. That's the entire reason this page ends in a list instead of a checkout.
Designed but not proven, and named rather than buried: the signals tier (executive-move intelligence as a leading indicator on unposted roles), and follow-up tracking from your mailbox once applications are live. Neither is claimed above.
What you need
No API keys. No app passwords. No mail filters. No developer accounts. Authorising the Gmail connector is the setup.
Founding pricing
It should not price above the flagship: kit #1 is $199/$349 for portfolio governance across every idea you'll ever have. This governs one search, for one person, for a period of months.
In plain English: the kit looks at public job boards and reads your own inbox. Every posting it finds, every judgment it makes, and every document it writes is saved on your machine, in files you can open, edit, or delete. Noetika Labs holds no account, no database, and no copy of your search. The one company with visibility into it is the AI provider whose subscription you already hold, since that is where the kit runs.